REGIONAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING EFFICIENCY ON HEALTH AND EDUCATION IN DECENTRALIZATION ERA : EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v3i1.452Keywords:
government, spending, efficiency, DEAAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to assess spending efficiency of regional governments in Indonesia on health and education during the fiscal decentralization period year of 2010-2017. Relying on a sample of 33 provinces as regional government, this paper compute efficiency scores adopting nonparametric frontier that estimated by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to study spending inefficiency. Results of the paper show that in west regions, Bali, Bangka Belitung, DI Yogyakarta, Jawa Tengah, and Kep. Riau relatively most efficient in public spending both on health and education in period of study. DKI Jakarta and Jawa Barat have efficient score on health, and Bengkulu has efficient score on education. On the other hand, in east regions, Gorontalo, Kalimantan Tengah, Kalimantan Timur and Sulawesi Utara were also most efficient in public spending on health and education services. Maluku and Sulawesi Tenggara have efficient score on health, and Kalimantan Selatan, Maluku Utara, Nusa Tenggara Barat, and Sulawesi Barat have efficient score on education. The results show that provinces in east regions of Indonesia were relatively more efficient in public spending both on health and education for promoting equal distribution of incomeReferences
Afonso, A., Kazemi, M. (2017). Assessing public spending efficiency in 20 OECD countries. In B. Bökemeier & A. Greiner (Eds.), Inequality and finance in macrodynamics. Dynamic modeling and econometrics in economics and finance (Vol. 23). Cham: Springer.
Afonso, A., St Aubyn, M. (2004). Non-parametric approaches to education and health expenditure efficiency in OECD countries. Working Papers Department of Economics 2004/01, ISEG – Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Afonso, A., Ebert, W., Schuknecht, & L., Thöne, M. (2005). Quality of Public Finances and Growth. Working Paper 438, European Central Bank.
Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Evidence for the new EU member states and emerging markets. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2147–2164. doi:10.1080/00036840701765460
Ahmad, E., Brosio, G. and Tanzi, V. (2008). Local Service Provision in Selected OECD Countries: Do Decentralized Operations Work Better?â€. IMF Working Paper, 08/67.
Arze del Granado, F.A., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. (2005). Fiscal Decentralization and The Functional Composition of Public Expenditures. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series.
Balaguer-Coll, M.T., Tortosa-Ausina, E., & Prior, D. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451.
Battese, G.E., Coelli, T.J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-232.
Bénassy-Quéré A., Gobalraja, N., & Trannoy, A. (2007). Tax and Public Input Competition. Economic Policy, CEPR & CES & MSH, 22(4), pp. 385-430.
Borger, B.D., Kertens, K. (1996). Cost Efficiency of Belgian Local Governments: A comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, pp. 145-170.
Cantarero, P.D., Sanchez, M.P. (2006). Decentralization and Health Care Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis within the European Union. Working Paper, University of Cantabria, Spain.
Carosi, L., Inverno, G.D., & Ravagli, L. (2014). Global public spending efficiency in Tuscan municipalities. Discussion Papers 2014/175, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Coelli, T.J., Prasada Rao, D.S., O’Donnell, C.J., & Battese, G.E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edition, Springer, New York.
Davoodi, H. and Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), pp. 244-257.
Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H.F. (1996). The Composition of Public Expenditures and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics,37,pp.313-344.
Fahriant, F.Y. dan Carolina, F. (2012). Analisis Efisiensi Anggaran Belanja Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Kapuas. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, Volume 13, Nomor 1
Fonchamnyo, D. C., Sama, M. C. (2016). Determinants of public spending efficiency in education and health: Evidence from selected CEMAC countries. Journal of Economic Finance, 40, 199–210. doi:10.1007/s12197-014-9310-6
Fredriksen, K. (2013). Decentralization and Economic Growth-Part 3: Decentralization, Infrastructure Investment and Educational Performance. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, 16.
Giménez, V. and Prior, D. (2007). Long-and short-term cost efficiency frontier evaluation: Evidence from Spanish local governments. Fiscal Studies, 28(1), 121-139.
Gonzalez-Alegre, J. (2010). Decentralization and the Composition of Public Expenditure in Spain. Regional Studies, 44(8), pp. 1067-1083.
Greene, W.H. (2005). Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach. World Bank.
Grigoli, F., Kapsoli, J. (2013). Waste Not, Want Not: The Efficiency of Health Expenditure in Emerging and Developing Economies. IMF Working Papers , 13/187.
Grisorio, M.J., Prota, F. (2011). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on the Composition of Public Expenditure: Panel Data Evidence from Italy. Societa italiana degli economisti, 52.
Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M. (2001). The Efficiency of Government Expenditure. Experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modelling, 23, pp. 433–467.
Gupta, S., Schwartz, G., Tareq, S., Allen, R., Adenauer, I., Fletcher, K., & Last D. (2007). Fiscal Management of Scale-Up Aid. IMF Working Paper, No. 07/222.
Herrera, S., Pang, G. (2005). Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: An Efficiency Frontier Approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3645.
Indriati, N.E. (2014). Analisis Efisien Belanja Daerah di Kabupaten Sumbawa (Studi Kasus Bidang Pendidikan dan Kesehatan). Jurnal Ekonomi Studi Pembangunan, 6 (2): 192-205
Jayasuriya, R., Wodon, Q. (2003). Efficiency in Reaching the Millennium Development Goals. World Bank Working Paper, 9.
Kappeler, A., Valila, T. (2008). Fiscal Federalism and the Composition of Public Investment in Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), pp. 562-570.
Keen, M., Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending. Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 66(1), pp. 33-53.
Lestari, T. (2013). Analisis Efisiensi Belanja Daerah di Jawa Timur (Studi Kasus Bidang Pendidikan dan Kesehatan Tahun 2009-2011). Jurnal Ilmiah, Universitas Brawijaya Malang
Musgrave, R. (1969). Theories of Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521–32.
Nasution, A. 2016. Government Decentralization Program in Indonesia. ADBI Working Paper, 601, Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/government-decentralization-program-indonesia/
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace, New York.
Puspitasari, E.D., Pujiati, A. (2017). Analisis Efisiensi Pengeluaran Pemerintah Sektor Kesehatan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Economics Development Analisys Journal, Volume 6, Nomor 1.
Ter-Minassian, T. (1997). Decentralization and Macroeconomic Management. IMF Working Paper, 97/155.
Yatiman N. , & Pujiyono A. (2013). “Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Anggaran Belanja Sektor Kesehatan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Privinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Tahun 2008-2010â€. Jurnal of Economics. Volume 2, Nomor 1, Halaman 1-13.
Zagler, M. &Dürnecker, G. (2003). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth.Journal of Economic Survey, 17, pp. 397-418.
Zhang, T. and Zou, H. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), pp. 221-240.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.