ANALISIS PENERAPAN ARM’S LENGTH PRINCIPLE PADA TRANSAKSI PEMBAYARAN ROYALTI ATAS PEMANFAATAN MEREK DAGANG (TRADEMARK) KEPADA PERUSAHAAN AFILIASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v4i4.34Keywords:
Transfer pricing, trademark, royalties, arm's length principleAbstract
Trademark is a unique marketing intangible. It does not only involve the expenses of marketing, advertising, and promoting, but the reputation of the trademark's owners also takes part in the development of trademark. Many parties involve in the development of trademark. In the context of transfer pricing, these parties entitle to some compensation. And arm's length principle must be applied to determine the reasonable compensation for the use of trademark. Transaction payment of royalties on trademarks is subject to taxes.
The taxation of transactions payment of royalties on the use of the trademark among affiliated companies also created disputes between the taxpayer and Tax collector. Cases disputed are related to the fairness of the transaction relating to the determination of royalty payments on trademarks which cover: definition, identification, allocation and valuation between affiliated companies (Caroline Silberztein, 2010). The dispute raises the burden of the cost of compliance for taxpayers and cost of collection to the tax authorities.
This study aims to determine how to identify ownership and economic benefits, as well as the best method which can be applied to determine the reasonable price of royalty payment transaction for the trademark use.
The results shows that in order to determine the parties entitled to compensation/ remuneration are: Party who can be legally declared to have legal ownership (legal owner) which are parties that have control over decisions related to the exploitation of the intangible as well as the right to restrict others to use intangible; Parties that contribute to the value of the trademark by identifying the parties who bear the cost and risk of the development of the trademark.
References
Boulogne, Gerard Frederik. 2008. Transfer Pricing of Intangibles: A comparison between The Netherlands and the United States.
Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Darrussalam, Denny Septriadi, dan B. Bawono Kristiaji. 2013. Transfer Pricing: Ide, Strategi dan Panduan Praktis dalam Perspektif Pajak Internasional. Jakarta: Danny Darussalam Tax Center.
Economics and Statistics Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2012. Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus. U.S. Department of Commerce.
Ernst & Young. 2010. Global Transfer Pricing Survey: Addressing the challenges of globalization. Ernst & Young.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 19 tentang Aset Tidak Berwujud. Jakarta: 2009.
Llinares, Emmanuel and Nihan Mert-Beydilli. 2006. Trade mark valuation: How to determine trade marks royalties. By of NERA Economic Consulting. International Tax Review, Tax Reference Library No. 32, “Intellectual Property (5th Edition)â€.
Llinares, Emmanuel and Nihan Mert-Beydilli.2006. Trade mark valuation: How to determine trade marks royalties. By of NERA Economic Consulting. International Tax Review, Tax Reference Library No. 32, “Intellectual Property (5th Edition)â€.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2010. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2010. OECD Model Tax Convention. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2013. OECD Revised Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Aspects of Intangibles. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2014. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidance on Aspect of Intangible. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Punithan, Thangadurai. 2013. Brand Promotion Expenditure: A Critical Analysis From The Perspective Of Indian Transfer Pricing. M/S. Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabhan & Ramamani Advocates.
Silberztein, Caroline. 2011. Transfer pricing aspects of intangibles: the OECD project. 08/11 Transfer Pricing International Journal. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., ISSN 2042-8154.
United Nations. 2011. United Nations (UN) Model Tax Convention. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Verlinden, Isabel, Axel Smit dan Bart Lieben. 2001. Intellectual Property Rights from a Transfer Pricing Perspective. Price Waterhouse Coopers Belgium.
Dokumen Publik dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia. 2001. Undang-Undang No. 15 tahun 2001 tentang Merek.
______________. 2008. Undang-undang No.7/1983 tentang Pajak Penghasilan sebagaimana telah beberapa kali diubah t e r a k h i r d e n g a n U n d a n g - U n d a n g No.36/2008.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor: PER-43/PJ/2010 tentang Pedoman Penentuan Harga Transfer Pricing. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, 2010.
______________. Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor: PER-32/PJ/2011 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Kewajaran dan Kelaziman Usaha dalam Transaksi antara Wajib Pajak dengan Pihak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, 2011.
______________. Peraturan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-22/PJ/2013 tentang Pedoman Pemeriksaan Terhadap Wajib Pajak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, 2013.
______________. Surat Edaran Nomor SE-50/PJ/2013 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pemeriksaan Terhadap Wajib Pajak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, 2013.
______________. Surat Direktur Pemeriksaan dan Penagihan Nomor: S-153/PJ.04/2010 tentang Panduan Pemeriksaan Kewajaran Transaksi Afiliasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, 2010.
Pengadilan Pajak. 2013. Putusan Banding Nomor Put-43648/PP/M.III/15/2013 atas Sengketa Pajak sebesar Rp 14.496.487.949.
______________. 2013. Putusan Banding Nomor Put-44616/PP/M.III/15/2013 atas Sengketa Pajak sebesar Rp 5.896.779.114.
______________. 2013. Putusan Banding Nomor Put-49339/PP/M.XII/15/2013 atas Sengketa Pajak sebesar USD 2,855,667.
______________. 2013. Putusan Banding Nomor Put-45162/PP/M.XV/15/2013 atas Sengketa Pajak sebesar USD 1,476,837.63.
______________. 2013. Putusan Banding Nomor Put. 48154/PP/M.XV/15/2013 atas S e n g k e t a P a j a k s e b e s a r Rp.9.809.385.167.
______________. 2015. Putusan Banding Nomor Put.59263/PP/M.XIIIA/15/2015 atas Sengketa Pajak sebesar Rp 469.862.113.680. United States Department of Treasury. 2006. Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Regulation § 1.482–0.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.