ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH PADA KUALITAS INDIKATOR OUTCOME: STUDI EMPIRIS PADA KABUPATEN/KOTA DI PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v4i4.37Keywords:
performance indicator, outcome, quality of outcome indicatorAbstract
This research aims at examining the effects of quality of mission, process to determining outcome indicator, culture, commitment, and authority to quality of outcome indicator at local government's RENSTRA and LAKIP documents. This research conducted on 5 local governments of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province. The respondents are the officials of that local governments. The instrument for collecting data is questioner. The obtained from this research are analyzed with multiple regression analysis. This research finding shows that quality of mission, process to determining outcome indicator, culture, and authority have statistically significant effects to quality of outcome indicator, but commitment hasn't statistically significant effects to quality of outcome indicator.
References
Anthony, Robert N. dan David W. Young, 2003, Management Control in Nonprofit Organization, seventh edition, 619-645, McGraw Hill-Irwin, New York.
Artley, Will dan Suzanne Stroh, 2001, The Performance Management Handbook Volume 2: Establishing an Integrated Performance Measurement System, 3-18, 25-40, A1-A4, Performance – Based Manage-ment Special Interest Group (PBMSIG), USA.
Bastian, Indra, 2001, Akuntansi Sektor Publik di Indonesia, cetakan pertama, edisi pertama, 329-351, BPFE, Yogyakarta.
____, 2006, Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Pengantar, 60-61, 266-328, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Bawono, Icuk Rangga, 2004, Problematika Penerapan Good Governance di Indonesia, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik Volume 05 Nomor 02, 86-94.
Behn, Robert D., 2004, Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures, Public Administration
Review Volume 63 Nomor 5, 586-606. Bryson, John M., 1995, Strategic Planning for
Public and Nonprofit Organization, A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, revised edition, 3-44, 65-81, Jossey Bass Publishers, San Fran-cisco.
Cavalluzzo, Ken S. dan Christopher D. Ittner, 2003 , Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Govern-ment, www. SSRN.com, 1-54.
Cooper, Donald R. dan Pamela S. Schindler, 2003, Business Research Method, international (eighth) edition, McGraw Hill Irwin, New York.
De Bruijn, Hans, 2002, Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement, The International Journal of Public Sector Management Volume 15 Nomor 7, 578-594.
De Lancer Julnes, Patria dan Marc Holzer, 2001, Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organization: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation, Public Administration Review Volume 61 Nomor 6, 693-708.
Flynn, Norman, 1997, Public Sector Management, third edition, 170-185, Prentice Hall Harvester Wheatsheaf, Maryland.
Ghozali, Imam, 2005, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, edisi III, 1-52, 79-134, 251-258, Badan Penerbit UNDIP, Semarang.
Harimurti, Yohanes, 2004, Problematika Suatu Instansi Pemerintah dalam Menyusun Indikator Kinerja, Tinjauan dari Dimensi Value For Money, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik Volume 05 Nomor 02, 1-9.
Hatry, Harry P. , 1999 , Performance Measurement, Getting Results, The Urban Institute Press, Washington DC.
Hood, Christopher, 1991, A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration Volume 69, 3-19.
Kreitner, Robert dan Angelo Kinicki, 2001, Organizational Behavior, international (fifth) edition, 68-96, 227, McGraw Hill Irwin, New York.
Laurensius, Ferry, 2004, Managemen Kinerja Sektor Publik: Mengatasi Hambatan dalam Siklus Pengukuran Kinerja, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik Volume 05 Nomor 02, 43-54.
____, 2005a, Problematika Penetapan Indikator Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik Volume 6 Nomor 2, 39-55.
____, 2005b, Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Rasional, Politik, dan Kultur Organisasi terhadap Pemanfaatan Informasi Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Daerah, Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Lembaga Administrasi Negara (LAN) Republik Indonesia, 2003, Keputusan Kepala Lembaga Administrasi Negara Nomor 239/IX/6/8/ 2003 tentang Perbaikan Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah;
____, Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1999 tentang Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, LAN, Jakarta.
Luthans, Fred, 1998, Organizational Behavior, eighth (international) edition, 148-150, 358, McGraw Hill-Irwin, New York.
Mahmudi dan Mardiasmo, 2004, Local Government Performance Measurement in the Era of Local Autonomy: The Case of Sleman Regency Yogyakarta, Sosiosains Volume 17 Nomor 1, 117- 133.
Mahmudi, 2002, Rerangka Metodologis Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik Volume 3 Nomor 1, 31-40.
____, 2005, Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, 1-136, 159-178, UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Mardiasmo, 2004, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, 1-28, 121-140, Andi, Yogyakarta.
Morley, Elaine, Scott P. Bryant, dan Harry P. Hatry, 2001, Comparative Performance Measurement, The Urban Institute Press, Washington DC.
Osborne, David dan Ted Gaebler, 1993, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, 108-165, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA.
Palmer, Anna J., 1993, Performance Measurement in Local Government, Public Money & Management, 31-36.
Pidd, M., 2005, Perversity in Public Service Performance Measurement, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Volume 54 Nomor 5/6, 482-493.
Poister, Theodore H. dan Gregory Streib, 1999, Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice, Public Administration Review Volume 59 Nomor 4, 325-335.
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 20 Tahun 2004 tentang Rencana Kerja Pemerintah.
____, PP Nomor 58 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.
____, PP Nomor 8 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
____, Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
____, UU Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara.
____, UU Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistim Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
____, UU Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Robbins, Stephen P., 1998, Organizational Behav i o r : Concepts, Controversies , Applications, eighth edition, 142-143, 482-483, Prentice Hall International, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Sekaran, Uma, 1992, Research Methods for Business (A Skill Building Approach), second edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Sulistiyani, Ambar Teguh dan Warsito Utomo, 2004, Analisis Kinerja Dinas Kesehatan, Studi Kasus Akreditasi Tempat Umum dan Industri Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Kulon Progo Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Sosiosains Volume 17 Nomor 4, 719-731.
Wang, XiaoHu, 2002, Perception and Reality in Developing an Outcome Performance Measurement System, International Journal of Public Administration Volume 25 Nomor 6, 805-829.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
