DID PUBLIC CASH TRANSFER CROWD OUT INTER-HOUSEHOLD TRANSFERS IN INDONESIA? EVIDENCE FROM "BANTUAN LANGSUNG TUNAI /BLT"

Authors

  • Corry Wulandari Universitas Indonesia ; University of Adelaide
  • Nadezhda Baryshnikova University of Adelaide

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v3i2.571

Keywords:

public transfers, private transfer, BLT, poor, DID, Coarsened Exact Matching

Abstract

In 2005 the Government of Indonesia introduced an unconditional cash transfer program called the ‘Bantuan Langsung Tunai’ (BLT), aimed at assisting poor people who were suffering from the removal of a fuel subsidy. There are concerns, however, that the introduction of a public transfer system can negatively affect inter-household transfers through the crowding-out effect, which exists when donor households reduce the amount of their transfers in line with public transfers received from the government. The poor may not therefore have received any meaningful impact from the public cash transfer, as they potentially receive fewer transfers from inter-household private donors. For the government to design a public transfer system, it is necessary to properly understand the dynamics of private transfer behaviour. Hence, this study evaluates whether there exists a crowding-out effect of public transfers on inter-household transfers in Indonesia.

Using data from the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) and by applying Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) and Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches, this study found that the likelihood to receive transfers from other family members (non-co-resident) reduces when the household receives BLT. However, there is no significant impact of BLT on transfers from parents and friends.

References

Cox, D., Hansen, B. E. and Jimenez, E. (2004). How responsive are private transfers to income? Evidence from a laissez-faire economy. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), pp. 2193-2219. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00069-0.

Friedman, J. and Levinsohn, J. A. (2001). The Distributional Impacts of Indonesia's Financial Crisis on Household Welfare: A "Rapid Response" Methodology. World Bank Economic Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 397-423 16(3). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.285154.

Gibson, J. (2006). New Zealand How Widespread are Non-linear Crowding Out Effects ? The Response of Private Transfers to Income in Four Developing Countries. Working Paper in Economics, 64(7).

Jung, H. and Pirog, M. A. (2015). Do public pensions crowd out private transfers to the elderly ?: evidence from South Korea. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance : 15(4), 455-477. doi:10.1017/S1474747214000493

Kang, S. J. (2004). Are private transfers crowded out by public transfers? The case of Nepal. Developing Economies, 42(4), pp. 510-528.

Kang, S. J. and Sawada, Y. (2009). Did public transfers crowd out private transfers in Korea during the financial crisis?. Journal of Development Studies, 45(2),pp.276-294. doi:10.1080/00220380802265017.

Kazianga, H. (2005). Motives for Household Private Transfers in Burkina Faso. Journal of Development Economics, 79, pp. 73-117. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1740-1.

Lai, M. S. (2009). Examining the Impact of Taiwan ' s Cash Allowance Program on Private Households. World Development. Elsevier Ltd, 37(7), pp. 1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.12.001.

Park, C. (2003). Interhousehold Transfers between Relatives in Indonesia: Determinants and Motives. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(4), pp. 929-944. doi: 10.1086/375014.

Parker, L. (2016). The theory and context of the stigmatisation of widows and divorcees ( janda ) in Indonesia. Indonesia and The Malay World, 44 (128)(March),pp.7-26. doi:10.1080/13639811.2015.1100863.

World Bank (2012) Social Assistance Program and Public Expenditure Review 2.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-05