WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT TAX AMNESTY? A SCOPING REVIEW

Authors

  • Nina Sabnita PKN STAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v3i2.669

Keywords:

Tax amnesty, amnesti pajak, pengampunan pajak, scoping review, scoping study

Abstract

Scoping review is increasingly common approach for reviewing research evidence to address broader topic. This scoping study aims to review the literatures on tax amnesty program and describe the factors related to tax amnesty, such as implementations, costs and benefits, participation, and the effects of the program, and lesson learned from countries around the world. This review also provides some policy recommendations for policy makers to make it useful in reaching the objectives of the amnesty

References

Alm and Beck. (1993). Tax Amnesties and Compliance in the Long Run - A Time-Series Analysis. National Tax Journal, 46 (1), 53-60.

Alm et al. (2009). Do Tax Amnesties Work? The Revenue Effects of Tax Amnesties during the Transition in the Russian Federation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39 (2), 235-253.

Anderson et al. (2008). Asking the right question: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6 (7).

Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32.

Bose and Jetter. (2012). Liberalization and tax amnesty in a developing economy. Economic Modelling, 12, 761-765.

Christian et al. (2002). Evidence on subsequent filling from the State of Michigan’s income tax amnesty. National Tax Journal, 55 (4), 703-721.

Darmayasa et al. (2016). Deconstruction of equitable tax amnesty. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14 (11), 8167-8179.

Das-Gupta and Mookherjee. (1995). Tax amnesties in India: an empirical evaluation.

Davis, K., Drey, N., and Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46 (10), 1386-1400.

Indonesia Directorate General of Taxes. (2017). Amnesty’s statistic. [Online]. Available at: http://www.pajak.go.id/statistik-amnesti. [Accessed: 30 May 2017]

Keithley, Steven. (2017). Indonesia’s flawed tax amnesty. [Online]. Available at: http://thediplomat.com/2017/03/indonesias-flawed-tax-amnesty/ [Accessed: 30 May 2017]

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., O’Brien, K.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69.

Lopez-Laborda and Rodrigo. (2003). Tax amnesties and Income Tax Compliance: The case of Spain. Fiscal studies, 24 (10), 73-96 53

Parle and Hirlinger. (1986). Evaluating the Use of Tax Amnesty by State Government. Public Administration Review, 46 (3), 246-255.

Pham et al. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 371-385.

Saracoglu and Caskurlu. (2011). Tax amnesty with effects and effecting aspects: tax compliance, tax audits and enforcement around: the Turkish case. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (7), 95-103.

The Economist. (2017). Indonesia’s tax amnesty passes its deadline. [Online]. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21719822-it-brought-windfallhas-been-criticised-letting-evaders [Accessed: 30 May 2017]

Torgler, Benno and Schaltegger, Christoph A. (2005). Tax Amnesties and Political Participation. Public Finance Review, 33 (3), 403-431.

Published

2020-02-25

How to Cite

Sabnita, N. (2020). WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT TAX AMNESTY? A SCOPING REVIEW. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 3(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v3i2.669