Perception Analysis of the Harmonized System: A Case Study of Tariff Disputes in Indonesia

Analisis Persepsi Sistem Harmonisasi: Studi Kasus Sengketa Tarif di Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31092/jpbc.v5i2.1249

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Classifying goods based on the Harmonized System (HS) is practical knowledge in Customs. This study analyzes the Harmonized System's perception differences in tariff disputes. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the considerations of the Indonesian Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in determining the classification of tariff based on the Harmonized System, the review of the tax court judge in deciding dispute verdict and its overall effect on tax refund. This research is a case study with qualitative research methods in the form of document studies and interviews.

Keywords: Harmonized System, HS Code, Import Tax

ABSTRAK

Mengklasifikasikan barang berdasarkan Harmonized System (HS) adalah pengetahuan praktis dalam Bea Cukai. Studi ini menganalisis perbedaan persepsi Harmonized System dalam sengketa tarif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan dan menganalisis pertimbangan Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai Indonesia (DJBC) dalam menentukan klasifikasi tarif berdasarkan Harmonized System, pertimbangan hakim pengadilan pajak dalam menentukan putusan sengketa dan pengaruhnya secara keseluruhan terhadap pengembalian pajak. Penelitian ini adalah studi kasus dengan metode penelitian kualitatif dalam bentuk studi dokumen dan wawancara.

Kata kunci: Harmonized System, HS Code, Pajak Impor

Author Biography

Christine Tjen, Universitas Indonesia

Departement of Accounting, Universitas Indonesia

References

Anwar, Syaiful. 2015. Cara Mudah Belajar Klasifikasi Tarif Bea Masuk Berdasarkan The Asean Harmonized Tariff Nomenclatures System. [An Easy Way to Learn Import Duty Classification Based on The Asean Harmonized Tariff Nomenclatures Systems]. Jakarta: Yogyakarta: Gambang

Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Designs: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. New Delhi: Sage Publication

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak [Directorate General of Taxation]. 2018. Laporan Tahunan 2017 [2017 Annual Report]. Retrieved in: https://www.pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan-2017

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak [Directorate General of Taxation]. 2017. Laporan Tahunan 2016 [2016 Annual Report]. Retrieved in: https://www.pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan-2016

Ellet, William. 2018. The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide, Harvard Business School Publishing.

Hilala, Adam Syaiful., Lisna, Vera. (2019). Pengaruh Dwelling Time pada Penerimaan Pajak Impor di Indonesia. [The Effect of Dwelling Time on Import Tax Receipts in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia [Journal of Indonesian Economy and Development], Vol 19 No. 2, 147–159.

International Monetary Fund. 2013. How Can an Excessive Volume of Tax Disputes Be Dealt With? (2013). retrieved in: https://www.imf.org/external/np/leg/tlaw/2013/eng/tdisputes.pdf

Kansil, CST. 1984. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia [Introduction to Indonesian Law]. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Kementerian Keuangan [Ministry of Finance]. 2017. Laporan Tahunan 2016 [2016 Annual Report]. Kementerian Keuangan. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved in: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/11141/laporan-tahunan-kementerian-keuangan-2017.pdf

Kementerian Keuangan [Ministry of Finance]. 2018. Laporan Kinerja 2017 [2017 Annual Report]. Kementerian Keuangan. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved in: https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/14512/laporan-tahunan-kementerian-keuangan-2018.pdf

Komariah, Rukiah and Purwito. 2006. Pengadilan Pajak: Proses Banding Sengketa Pajak, Pabean dan Cukai. [Tax Court: Tax, Customs and Excise Dispute Appeal Process.] Jakarta. Badan Penerbit FHUI

List, Friedrich. 1841. The National System of Political Economy by Friedrich List, trans. Sampson S. Lloyd, with an Introduction by J. Shield Nicholson. London: Longmans, Green, and co.,

Nugroho, Budi; Hikmah, Muhammad. 2014. Faktor Penyebab Kekalahan Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepabeanan Melalui Pengadilan Pajak [Directorate General of Customs and Excise Defeat Causative Factors in Settling Customs Disputes through the Tax Court]. Kajian Akademis BPPK Kementerian Keuangan. [Academic Study of Financial Education and Training Board, Ministry of Finance]

Purwito, A. 2008. Kepabeanan dan Cukai (Pajak Lalu Lintas Barang): Teori dan Aplikasi [Customs and Excise (Traffic Tax): Theory and Application]. Jakarta: Kajian Hukum Fiskal FHUI [Study of Fiscal Law, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia].

Pengadilan Pajak Indonesia. [Indonesian Tax Court]. Risalah Putusan. 2019. Retrieved in: http://www.setpp.kemenkeu.go.id/risalah

Pflüger, M. and Tabuchi, T. 2019. Comparative advantage, agglomeration economies, and trade costs. Journal of Urban Economics, 109, pp.1–13

Black, Henry Campbell. 1981. Black's Law Dictionary (5th ed. Published in 1979). St. Paul: West Publishing Co.

Pusdiklat Bea dan Cukai, Kementerian Keuangan [Customs Education and Training Center]. 2017. Modul Materi Klasifikasi Barang [Harmonized System Material Module]. Jakarta: BPPK Kemenkeu [Financial Education and Training Board, Ministry of Finance]

Santoso, Maulana Budi. 2019. Interview with Head of Appeal Section, Directorate of Appeals and Regulations, Directorate General of Customs and Excise.

Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach 7th Edition. UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

Stanford Research Institute. 1951. Chemical Economics Handbook. Stanford: Chemical Economics Service, Departement of Business and Industrial Economics

Sugiyono, Prof. Dr. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kebijakan [Policy Research Methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta

The World Bank. 2010. Forms of Import Tariffs. Retrieved in https://wits.worldbank.org/wits/wits/witshelp/content/data_retrieval/p/intro/C2.Forms_of_Import_Tariffs.htm

LIST OF STATUTES AND REGULATIONS

Law Number 16/2000 regarding Second Amendment to Law Number 6/1983 Concerning General Provisions and Tax Procedures

Government Regulation of Republic Indonesia Number 29/2017 concerning Payment Methods and Goods Delivery Methods in Export and Import Activities

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51/PMK.04/2017 concerning Customs Objection

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 225/PMK.04/2015 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 139/PMK.04/2007 Concerning Customs Inspection in the Import Sector

¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 226/PMK.04/2015 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 155/PMK.04/2008 concerning Customs Declaration

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 187/PMK.03/2015 concerning Procedures for Tax Overpayment Refunds That Should Not Have Been Outstanding

Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia PMK 17/PMK.010/2020 concerning Determination of the Harmonized System and Imposing Import Duty Tariffs on Imported Goods

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Nugrahaeni, R., & Tjen, C. (2021). Perception Analysis of the Harmonized System: A Case Study of Tariff Disputes in Indonesia: Analisis Persepsi Sistem Harmonisasi: Studi Kasus Sengketa Tarif di Indonesia. JURNAL PERSPEKTIF BEA DAN CUKAI, 5(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpbc.v5i2.1249

Issue

Section

Articles