PERBANDINGAN ALTERNATIF ASPEK PEMAJAKAN BAGI PENYEDIA LAYANAN OVER THE TOP ASING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v1i1.596Abstract
Over the years, the rise of digital economy has confused countries in their efforts to tax foreign companies without physically presence within their jurisdiction. One of the potential tax revenues that have not been optimally digging comes from the digital sector. The digital economy sector has enormous potential along with the rapid development of information and communication technology, especially the internet. This digital economy market is dominated by internet-based services commonly called Over The Top (OTT) services and is filled with global content owned by foreign companies. This article argues the provisions of taxation for foreign OTT lending providers in England, Australia, India, and Japan. This research used a qualitative non-case study approach. This study outlines the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative.References
Buku dengan Pengarang Tunggal:
Gunadi. 2007. Pajak Internasional. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Hutagaol, John L. 2000. Pemahaman Praktis P3B. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
In-text reference: (Hutagaol, 2000)
Moleong, Lexy J. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Artikel Jurnal:
Anderson, John. 2016. An Over-The-Top Exemption: It’s Time to Fairly Tax and Regulate the New Internet Media Services. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
Brauner, Yariv dan Andres Baez. 2015. Withholding Taxes in the Service of BEPS Action 1: Address the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications BV.
CBDT. 2016. Proposal for Equalization Levy on Specified Transactions. New Delhi: CBDT.
Demski, J. S., and D. E. M. Sappington. 1989. Hierarchical structure and responsibility accounting, Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Spring): 40-58.
DG-IPOL. 2015. Over-theTop Players: Market Dynamics and Policy Challenges. Brussels: European Union.
HMRC. 2015. Diverted Profits Tax: Guidance. London: HMRC.
Hongler, Peter dan Pasquale Pistone. 2015. Blueprints for a New PE Nexus to Tax Business Income in the Era of the Digital Economy. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications BV.
Mehta, Amar. 2016. Is the Equalisation Levy Compatible with India’s Existing Treaty Network. Bengaluru: India International Tax.
National Tax Agency. 2015. Revision of Consumption Taxation on Cross-border Supplies of Services. Tokyo: National Tax Agency.
Website:
Aeny, Suci Noor. 2017. Begini Cara Negeri Kanguru Pajaki Facebook dan Google. DDTCNews, 23 Maret 2017. http://news.ddtc.co.id/artikel/9668/australiabegini-cara-negeri-kanguru-pajaki-facebook-dan-google/ (diakses 29 September 2017).
APJII. 2016. Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. Jakarta: APJII.
Australian Taxation Office. Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law (MAAL). https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Large-business/In-detail/Business-bulletins/ Articles/Multinational-Anti-Avoidance-Law-(MAAL)/ (diakses 30 September 2017).
BBC Indonesia. 2017. Google Capai Kesepakatan Soal Pembayaran Pajak di Indonesia. BBC Indonesia, 13 Juni 2017. http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia40258540 (diakses 29 September 2017).
Cahyani, Dewi Rina. 2017. Google Menunggak Pajak, Begini Cara India Menagihnya. Tempo.co, 19 Januari 2017. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/837561/googlemenunggak-pajak-begini-cara-india-menagihnya (diakses 29 September 2017).
Darussalam, Danny. 2016. Bentuk Usaha Tetap (BUT). DDTCNews, 15 September 2016. http://news.ddtc.co.id/artikel/7816/pajak-internasional-6-bentuk-usahatetap-but/ (diakses 29 September 2017).
Deshmukh, Dharsana. 2017. Equalisation Levy: A Year in Review!. Orange, 13 Juni 2017. http://orange.taxsutra.com/articles/7deffae4ea5519280b47e63972d116/ expert_article (diakses 30 Desember 2017). American Accounting Association, Committee on Concepts and Standards for External Financial Reports. 1977. Statement on Accounting Theory and Theory Acceptance. Sarasota, FL: AAA.
Diverted Profits Tax Act 2017. Australia. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017A00021 (diakses 29 September 2017).
Fajrina, Hani Nur. 2016. Cara Inggris Kejar Pajak dari Google. CNN Indonesia, 20 September 2016. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20160920145646185-159680/cara-inggris-kejar-pajak-dari-google/ (diakses 29 September 2017).
Finance Act 2016. India. http://www.cbec.gov.in/resources//htdocs-cbec/finact2016.pdf (diakses 29 September 2017).
Finance Act 2015. Inggris. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/11/pdfs/ukpga_20150011en.pdf (diakses 29 September 2017).
Glienmourinsie, Disfiyant. 2017. Pemerintah dan Google Capai Kesepakatan Pajak. Sindonews, 13 Juni 2017.
https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1213163/33/ pemerintah-dan-google-capai-kesepakatan-pajak-1497333026 (diakses 29 September 2017).
Government of the United Kingdom. Diverted Profits Tax Yield: Methodological Note. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diverted-profits-tax-yieldmethodological-note/diverted-profits-tax-yield-methodological-note (diakses 29 September 2017).
Nistanto, Reska K. 2016. Google, Facebook, dan OTT Asing Gondol Rp 14 Triliun Keluar Indonesia. Kompas.com, 1 Mei 2016. http://tekno.kompas.com/read/2016/05/01/15140057/Google.Facebook.dan.OTT.Asing.Gondol.Rp.14.Triliun.Keluar.Indonesia (diakses 29 September 2017).
Pinto, Dale. 2003. E-commerce and Source-based Income Taxation. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications BV.
Quddus, Ghina Ghaliya. 2017. Google Akhirnya Setuju Bayar Pajak di Indonesia. Tribunnews.com, 14 Juni 2017.
http://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2017/06/14/google-akhirnya-setuju-bayarpajak-di-indonesia (diakses 29 September 2017).
___________. 2017. Pajak Akui Sulit Pajaki Bisnis Digital Asing. Kontan.co.id, 16 Juni 2017. http://m.kontan.co.id/news/pajak-akui-sulit-pajaki-bisnis-digitalasing (diakses 29 September 2017).
Santos, Ramon Tomazela. 2016. The United Kingdom’s Diverted Profits Tax and Tax Treaties: An Evaluation. Bulletin for International Taxation 70, no. 7: 399-405.
Tax Journal. 2015. Views from Business on the Coalition’s Tax policies and Priorities for a New Government. Report of a Tax Journal/Pinsent Masons Survey May 2015. London: Tax Journal.
Tax Laws Amendment (Combating Multinational Tax Avoidance) Act 2015 No. 170, 2015. Australia. https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/pdf/acts/20150170.pdf (diakses 29 September 2017).
Utomo, Eviera Maharani. 2013. Transaksi E-commerce sebagai Potensi Penerimaan Pajak di Indonenesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Surabaya 2, no. 1
Buku Terjemahan:
Creswell, John W. 2014. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset, Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan. Penerj. Ahmad L. Lazuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Karya Ilmiah:
Mustika, Nita 2008. Kebijakan Pajak atas Penghasilan yang Didapat dari Transaksi E-commerce. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
OECD. 1989. Tax Treaty Overrides. Paris: OECD Publishing.
___________. 2001. Tax Treaty Characterisation Issues. Paris: OECD Publishing.
___________. 2003. Commentaries on The Articles of The Model Tax Convention. Paris: OECD Publishing.
___________. 2014. Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Action Plan 1: 2014 Deliverables. Paris: OECD Publishing.
___________. 2015. Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Action Plan 1: 2015 Final Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Sukiro, Armen Ringgo. 2017. Analisis Karakteristik Perusahaan Penyedia Layanan Over The Top (OTT) Asing di Indonesia dan Kriteria Significant Digital Presence dari Sisi Perpajakan. Tangerang Selatan: Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
