DAMPAK SAFEGUARD ATAS IMPOR BENANG TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN: PENDEKATAN MODEL CGE

Authors

  • Indri Riesfandiari PKN STAN
  • Ario Seno Nugroho Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
  • Imam Tri Wahyudi DJBC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31092/jpbc.v5i2.1307

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of safeguard on yarn industry’s output, textile and apparel industry as the upper stream’s output, and economics welfare. Government of Indonesia implement safeguard on yarn from 2019 to 2022, to protect domestic industries from an increased quantities as to cause or threaten serious injury to domestic producers of like or directly competitive products. This study uses computable general equilibrium (CGE) model incorporating Indonesia Input - Output Table year 2016. The study exercised two scenario/simulations:(1) assessing safeguard impact; and (2) assessing combination of safeguard and tax incentive impact. The results showed that safeguard on yarn import decrease import value of yarn, but did not increase yarn’s and its upper stream industry’s output. Safeguard tend to decrease the utility or welfare of the economics. In the other hand, policy combination of safeguard and tax incentive decrease yarn import, but did not impact on upper stream industry’s import. The policy combination also increases yarn industry’s output, and increase the utility or welfare of the economics.

Keywords: compensating variation, fiscal incentive, textile and apparel industry, utility, welfare

ABSTRAK: 

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak safeguard terhadap produktivitas atau output industri benang dan industri tekstil dan produk tekstil sebagai industri hilir, serta dampak safeguard terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat dalam perekonomian. Pemerintah Indonesia menerapkan safeguard atas benang pada tahun 2019 s.d. 2022 sebagai bentuk perlindungan terhadap industri tekstil dalam negeri dari peningkatan impor benang yang menyebabkan, atau dicurigai akan mengakibatkan kerugian serius terhadap industri yang bersangkutan.

Penelitian menggunakan computable general equilibrium (CGE) model dengan data Tabel I-O Indonesia tahun 2016. Pengujian dilakukan dalam dua simulasi yaitu: (1) shock berupa penerapan safeguard; (2) kombinasi dari shock berupa penerapan safeguard dan fasilitas fiskal berupa pengurangan penghasilan industri untuk perhitungan pajak penghasilan wajib pajak Badan. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa safeguard menurunkan impor benang, tetapi tidak meningkatkan output domestik dan cenderung menurunkan utilitas/kesejahteraan masyarakat. Safeguard yang dikombinasikan dengan fasilitas pajak penghasilan mampu menurunkan impor, meningkatkan output (walaupun belum sampai tahap ekspor), dan meningkatkan utilitas/kesejahteraan masyarakat.

Kata kunci: compensating variation, industri tekstil dan produk tekstil, fiscal incentive, utilitas, kesejahteraan

Author Biography

Indri Riesfandiari, PKN STAN

Customs

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ananthakrishnan, P., & Jain-Chandra, S. (2005). The Impact on India of Trade Liberalization in the Textiles and Clothing Sector. IMF Working Paper WP/05/214.

API. (2013). Permohonan Perpanjangan Pengenaan BMTP terhadap Impor Produk Benang Kapas Selain Benang Jahit. Diakses dari http://kppi.kemendag.go.id/

API. (2019). Bukti Awal Permohonan Penyelidikan dalam Rangka Tindakan Pengamanan Perdagangan terhadap Impor Barang Benang (Selain Benang Jahit) dari Serat Stapel Sintetik dan Artifisial. Diakses dari http://kppi.kemendag.go.id/daftar_kasus/detail_produk/1/5/117

Baldwin, R. E. (1982). The Political Economy of Protectionism. In J. N. Bhagwati (Ed.), Import Competition and Response. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baldwin, R.E., & Steagall, J. W. (1993). An Analysis of Factors Influencing ITC Decisions in Anti Dumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases. NBER Working Paper Series, 4282.

BKPM. (2021). Data Statistik Perkembangan Investasi. https://nswi.bkpm.go.id/data_statistik

Bown, C. P. (2007). China's WTO Entry: Antidumping, Safeguards, and Dispute Settlement. NBER Working Paper 13349. DOI 10.3386/w13349

Burfisher, M. (2017). Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BPS. (2020). Indikator Ekonomi. Buletin Statistik Bulanan.

Budiyono, A., Kato, R.R. (2011). Should Indonesia Suffer from More Reduction of The Subsidy to the Petroleum Sector. IUJ Research Institute.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2016. https://pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan-2016-direktorat-jenderal-pajak

European Commission, IMF, OECD, World Bank. (2009). System of National Account 2008. New York.

Gandolfo, G. (2014). International Trade Theory and Policy (Second ed.). Berlin: Springer.

Hartati, E. S. (2021, April 22). Urgensi Membangkitan Industri TPT Guna Pemulihan Daya Beli. Diskusi Online INDEF: TPT Bangkit, Daya Beli Terungkit. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA2zoEMV1Lc

Heydon, K. (2020). The Political Economy of International Trade. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Huang, C. H. (2015). Tax Credits and Total Factor Productivity: Firm Level Evidence from Taiwan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(6), pages 932-947. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9358-7

Indrasari, D. P. R. & Rachmawati, F. I. (2017). Pengaruh Kebijakan BMTP terhadap Price Cost Margin Industri Manufaktur yang Diproteksi. Journal of Research in Economics and Management, 17(No. 1), 147-160. doi:10.17970/jrem.17.1701011.ID

Ivanic, Maros & Martin, Will. (2014). Poverty Impacts of the Volume-Based Special Safeguard Mechanism. WB Policy Research Working Paper(7006).

Jordan, D. R., Labrador, I. S., Sanz, J. F. (2020). Is the Corporation Tax a Barrier to Productivity Growth? Small Business Economics, 55: 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00136-x

Kemenkeu. (2014). PMK Nomor 96/PMK.011/2014 tentang Pengenaan BMTP terhadap Impor Benang Kapas Selain Benang Jahit.

Kemenkeu. (2016). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian Keuangan Tahun 2016. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/6313/laporan-kinerja-kemenkeu-2016.pdf

Kemenkeu. (2019). PMK Nomor 161/PMK.010/2019 tentang Pengenaan BMTPS terhadap Impor Produk Benang (Selain Benang Jahit) dari Serat Stapel Sintetik dan Artifisial.

Kemenkeu. (2020). PMK Nomor 56/PMK.010/2020 tentang Pengenaan BMTP terhadap Impor Produk Benang (Selain Benang Jahit) dari Serat Stapel Sintetik dan Artifisial. (2020).

Kemenperin. (2015). Rencana Induk Pembangunan Industri Nasional 2015 - 2035.

Kemenperin. (2016). Making Indonesia 4.0.

Kemenperin. (2021). Kinerja, Peningkatan Ekspor, Pengamanan Pasar Dalam Negeri dan Substitusi Impor Industri TPT. Diskusi Online INDEF 22 April 2021.

Kemendag. (2021). Kebijakan Trade Remedies Mendorong Peningkatan Daya Saing Industri. Diskusi Online INDEF 22 April 2021.

KPPI. (2019). Laporan Penyelidikan Sementara Preliminary Determination dalam Rangka Rekomendasi Pengenaan BMTPS terhadap Impor Barang Benang (Selain Benang Jahit) dari Serat Stapel Sintetik dan Artifisial. Jakarta: Komite Pengamanan Perdagangan Indonesia. Diakses dari http://kppi.kemendag.go.id/daftar_kasus/detail_produk/1/5/117

Krugman, P. R., Maurice, O., & Melitz, Marc J. (2018). International Trade Theory and Policy Global Edition. UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Lee, Joosung J. (2011). An Outlook for Cambodia's Garment Industry in the Post-Safeguard Policy Era. Asian Survey, 51(3), 559. doi:AS.2011.51.3-559

Lee, H., & Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2005). The Impact o f the U.S. Safeguard Measures on Northeast Asian Producers: General Equilibrium Assessments. In Lee, H., Ramstetter, E.D., & Movshuk (Ed.), Restructuring of The Steel Industry in Northeast Asia: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lestari, S. K. (2010). Tinjauan Yuridis atas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Industri Dalam Negeri Melalui Peraturan Nasional Dikaitkan dengan Upaya Safeguards dalam WTO.

Mc Laren, John. (2013). International Trade Economic Analysis of Globalization and Policy. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Mutuc, M. E., Mohanty, S., Ethridge, D., & Hudson, D. (2011). The Effects of the Removal of US Safeguards on Imports from China. Applied Economic Letters.

Oktaviani, Rina. (2011). Model Ekonomi Keseimbangan Umum Teori dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Bogor: IPB Press.

Pan, Suwen., Welch, M., Mohanty, S., & He, X. (2007). Distortions of Sino-US and Sino-EU Safeguard Agreements: Effects on World Textile Markets. Cina & World Economy, 15(No. 4), 78-88.

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 45 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Thaun 2010 tentang Penghitungan Penghasilan Kena Pajak dan Pelunasan Pajak Penghasilan dalam Tahun Berjalan.

Ricardo, D. (2004). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Salvatore, D. (2013). International Economics. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Shinkai, Naoko. (2000). Does the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem Explain the Movement in Wages? Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. 436.

Sorayan, P. H. (2021). Implementasi SAM dalam Analisis Kebijakan.

Takechi, K. (2020). Do domestic producers benefit from safeguards? The case of a Japanese safeguard on Chinese vegetable imports in 2001. Japan and the World Economy, 55. doi:10.1016/j.japwor.2020.101024

WTO. (1994). Analytical Index GATT 1994-Article XIX (Jurisprudence).

WTO. (n.d.). Understanding the WTO: The Agreements Anti Dumping, Subsidies, Safeguards: Contingencies, etc. Diakses dari https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm8_e.htm#safeguards

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Riesfandiari, I., Seno Nugroho, A., & Wahyudi, I. T. . (2021). DAMPAK SAFEGUARD ATAS IMPOR BENANG TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN: PENDEKATAN MODEL CGE. JURNAL PERSPEKTIF BEA DAN CUKAI, 5(2), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpbc.v5i2.1307

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)